Clear and Consise Communication
This past week Rush Limbaugh, after the SOTU reiterated what I was taught and what I teach my daughter; "Words have meaning". Everytime Rush says that I jump for joy thinking fondly of my parents and praying it sinks in to the millions of listeners to his show. Some if not many people miss the point of that statement sadly, thinking ; well, of course words have definition.
Single word definition alone is not what is meant here. Placing words together in a sentence be it verbal or printed they take on "meaning".
The reason of my concern here is that liberals (at least the leadership) know eaxctly what I speak of and utilize
sweeping generalities attempting to fool an unsuspecting populus. We on the right must avoid
sweeping generalities and be very clear and concise as to our use of the English language when warning of the lefts policies , our goals and even communicating with each other so as not to be divisive within our side of the debate.
Recently I was described as being both
"rigid" and
"exclusive". These to adjectives to those who know me personnally may be both
true and
false at the same time. I give this example to simply clarify the point.
By the
"rigid" part, I am assuming (which I do not like to do) this person meant I was a Conservative idealogue, if so then that is
true and I am more than pleased to agree. But
outside of that context (politics) it is completely false. How can I, a man who is
happily married and be
"rigid" at the same time? Sounds like divorce after 5 minutes of the nuptuals! So, both true and false.
Well of course being
happily married rules out the
"exclusivity" part as well for much the same reason. If I were in fact
"exclusive", then why marry at all? Being married is by institution and practice is to be
"inclusive". Then again, since I am married I suppose my wife is
"exclusive" to me as I am
"exclusive" to her. You see, both
true and
false at the same time again.
Words have meaning as does the context with which one utilizes, choose them wisely and not in sweeping generalities. In doing so, we also avoid misrepesentation and needless debate.
If anyone wishes to call me a Conservative then by all means do so, a waste of time though considering the title of this blog and my stances published within. Ponder this though, does anyone believe the writing of The Declaration of Independance , The Bill of Rights or the U.S. Constitution was an act of "rigidity" or that of "exclusivity"?
Those documents and their meaning are exactly what a Conservative lives by and defends, period. This is not
"rigid" except maybe on the contraints (or did?) it places on the federal goverment and are also very
"inclusive" so as to cover
any and all citizens of our nation.
Humor
This subject goes right to the old saying; "One mans junk is another man's treasure". There is not one of us that has told a joke or relayed a story what we thought to be funny just to be lost on the recipient and thus producing no laughter.
The lack of laughter or appreciation of the humor is not a statement on the person delivering the joke/story, but rather the listener quite simply not seeing the humor in it.
If Johnny Carson took offense (publically) every time he did not get a laugh we would not know of his name to this day.
Some Saturday Night Music
This selection goes right to to the Gal I married and who has improved my life immensely ever since, I Love ya Boo and Thank You!