Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Govt. Unions vs. Taxpayers



Most of us realize the legacy costs of unions in the private sector, that due to the recent passage of unconstitutional health destruction plan will now fall on taxpayers (its in the bill). But the numbers are a bit murky if not under reported (go figure) when it comes to what we already pay for in the form of public union costs, which include both current and legacy dollars.

The following is Dan Mitchell of the CATO Instsitute on CNBCs' The Kudlow Report discussing this outrageous situation;


So you do not have to pause or rewind I have captured the very telling screen-shot of the chart for your study.

Just look at the disparity between what you get for your hard-earned money compared to what they get from your confiscated hard-earned money;



Thank you JFK?

Just imagine the tax increase to afford even more government workers due to the unconstitutional health destruction plan besides the sharp rise in health care costs that it will deliver!


Tuesday, March 30, 2010

Hmmm ? Columbia University Selling a Degree,, to Obama?



Well this is certainly interesting to say the least ,,,,



What a line: “The long-legged Mack Daddy"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=mack+daddy

From the YouTube description:
Columbia University Trial For Treason and Obama Fraud Parts 1 & 2, Fraudulent Degree, Hon. James David Manning PhD of The Manning Report explains why he's taking Columbia University to court on 14th May 2010

More & more well meaning and good hearted folk are now standing up, and revealing the duplicity of our governments .. here we see, and hear that Columbia University is selling degrees ... Mr Obama has a fraudulent Major Degree, bought for him with Saudi Arabian money!! A court hearing is to be held in May 2010 .. please, Viral This ...

H/T to Tom over @ http://tomschuckmanjournal.blogspot.com/

Monday, March 29, 2010

This is What B. Hussein Wants To Sell



From the House Committee on Ways and Means 


2009

Medicare cuts to hospitals begin (long?term care (7/1/09) and inpatient and rehabilitation facilities (FY10))

2010

• Provide income exclusion for specified Indian tribe health benefits provided after 3/23/10

• Temporary high?risk pool and high?cost union retiree reinsurance ($5 B each for 3.5 years) (6/23/10)

• Impose 10% tax on indoor UV tanning (7/1/10)

Medicare cuts to inpatient psych hospitals (7/1/10)

Prohibits lifetime and annual benefit for private insurers spending limits (plan years beginning 9/23/10)

Prohibits non?group private insurance plans from canceling coverage (rescissions) (plan years beginning 9/23/10)

Requires private insurance plans to cover, at no charge, most preventive care (plan years beginning 9/23/10)

Requires private insurance plans to allow dependents to stay on parents’ policies through age 26 (plan years

beginning 9/23/10)

• Hospitals in “Frontier States” (ND, MT, WY, SD, UT ) receive higher Medicare payments (FY11)

2011

• Hospitals in “low?cost” areas receive higher Medicare payments for 2 yrs ($400 million, FY11)

• Medicare Advantage cuts begin

No longer allowed to use FSA, HSA, HRA, Archer MSA distributions for over?the-counter medicines

Medicare cuts to home health begin

Medicare cuts for wealthier seniors ($85k/$170k), who are forced to pay higher Part D premiums (not indexed for inflation in Parts B/D)

Medicare reimbursement cuts when seniors use diagnostic imaging like MRIs, CT scans, etc.

Medicare cuts begin to ambulance services, ASCs, diagnostic labs, and durable medical equipment

Impose new annual tax on brand name pharmaceutical companies

Americans begin paying premiums for federal long?term care insurance (the CLASS Act, which analysis indicates is a ticking fiscal time-bomb)

• Private insurance plans required to spend a minimum of 80% of premiums on medical claims (where 65% is considered the maximum “safe” amount to cover claims). Prior experience at the state level will indisputably harm private health insurance business.

• Physicians in “Frontier States” (ND, MT, WY, SD, UT ) receive higher Medicare payments

Prohibition on Medicare payments to new physician?owned hospitals (which will dramatically reduce access to senior care)

Penalties for non?qualified HSA and Archer MSA distributions double (to 20%)

Seniors prohibited from purchasing power wheelchairs unless they first rent for 13 months

New Medicare cuts to long?term care hospitals begin (7/1/11)

Additional Medicare cuts to hospitals and cuts to nursing homes and inpatient rehab facilities begin (FY12)

New taxes on all private health insurance policies to pay for comparative effectivness research (plan

years beginning FY12)

2012

Medicare cuts to dialysis treatment begins

Medicare to cut spending by using an HMO?like coordinated care model (Accountable Care Organizations)

New Medicare cuts to inpatient psych hospitals (7/1/12)

Medicare cuts to hospitals with high readmission rates begin (FY13)

Medicare cuts to hospice begin (FY13)

2013

Impose $2,500 annual cap on FSA contributions (indexed to CPI)

Increase Medicare wage tax by 0.9% and impose a new 3.8% tax on unearned , nonactive business income for those earning over $200k/$250k (not indexed to inflation)

• Generally increases (7.5% to 10%) threshold at which medical expenses, as a % of income, can be deductible

Eliminate deduction for Part D retiree drug subsidy employers receive

Impose 2.3% excise tax on medical devices

Medicare cuts to hospitals who treat low?income seniors begin

• $500,000 deduction cap on compensation paid to insurance company employees and officers

2014

Unconstitutional personal mandate begins: Individuals without government?approved coverage are subject to a tax of the greater of $695 or 2.5% of income

• Employers who fail to offer “affordable” coverage would pay a $3,000 penalty for every employee that receives a subsidy through the Exchange

• Employers who do not offer insurance must pay a tax penalty of $2,000 for every fulltime employee

More Medicare cuts to home health begin

• All non?grandfathered and Exchange health plans required to meet federally mandated levels of coverage

States must cover parents /childless adults up to 138% of poverty on Medicaid, receive increased FMAP

• Tax credits available for Exchange?based coverage, amount varies by income up to 400% of poverty

• Private insurers cannot impose any coverage restrictions on pre?existing conditions (guaranteed issue/renewability, which will bankrupt insurance providers)

• Private insurers must offer coverage to anyone wanting a policy and every policy has to be renewed (which will bankrupt insurance providers)

• Insurance plans must include government?defined “essential benefits ” and coverage levels

• Government board (IPAB) begins submitting proposals to cut Medicare

Impose tax on nearly all private health insurance plans

Medicare payment cuts for hospital?acquired infections begin (FY15)

2015

More Medicare cuts to home health begin

2016

Impose “Cadillac tax on “high cost” plans, 40% tax on the benefit value above a certain threshold: ($10,200 individual coverage, $27,500 family or self?only union multiemployer coverage)


H/T directorblue - Green Room - Hot Air.com

Dateline Michigan - Here We go !



 

Sunday, March 28, 2010

Tea Party Express Coming To The Detroit Area



News From Tea Party Express III: Tell one tell all ,,,,,,,,,,,

Tea Party Express III Rolls Into Metro Detroit

Sunday April 11, 2010

10a. to 12p.

Come One !! Come All !!


 The Scheduled Venue is:

CIVIC CENTER PARK & HISTORICAL VILLAGE

40700 Romeo Plank Road

Clinton Township, MI 48038-2942
 
A Big Thanks & H/T to http://bonsaifromtheright.blogspot.com/ for this info

Best Rally Sign Yet !

The following rally pic I recieved via email from a good friend and Patriot Brian who has contributed to Conservative Perspective in the past and also has a great sense of humor. Makes one actually long for the days of Slick Willy.


Hmmm, Who might be game for that?


Saturday, March 27, 2010

CP Jukebox - Lita Ford and Missing Persons






My Thoughts on Sarah Palin

Sarah Palin seems to some on the Right as the one person who can deliver us from evil, not a savoir of course, but one who holds the keys to the Constitution itself.

In my Conservative Perspective this is a huge mistake.

Do not misunderstand, on a personal level I admire the former Governor for what she accomplished in Alaska as there is much to be admired for her leadership in that State.

But one has to pay attention as to what happens in politics.

It is exactly what she did as Governor that McCain tapped her as a running mate in 2008, her skills and achievments trumped his own and not only that, her ideology also trumped his own as she was, I repeat was a Conservative and conversly he was not and has never been.


                                      

Now we see Ms. Palin, no longer in politics (elected status) campaigning for re-election of McCain? Palin also campainged for Perry in Texas (RINO) where Medina was the obvious Conservative.
(NY-23 ring a bell?)

I guess it is pay-back time for Ms. Palin, the final payment is now due and McCain is calling in his marker.

How can Palin be a Conservative, yet campaign for McCain?

Is Palin for amnesty for illegal aliens?
            McCain is. (As was Bush 43 for that matter)

Is Palin for Campaign Finance Reform (McCain-Feingold) that the Supreme Court just recently STRUCK DOWN?

Apparently McCain held that free speech is unacceptable in American politics no less, whereas the Supreme Court DISAGREED!
These are but two examples of those who claim the mantle of Conservatism, yet when thinking no one is watching capitulates to those who seek nothing less than to rip up the Constitution piece by piece.

Go home Sarah, go home to Wassila.

Your service is no longer needed or wanted for as it is, it only hurts the cause and the cause being that of freedom.

Thursday, March 25, 2010

Honestly, What Did They Expect?

We hear of threats against elected politicians, mind you only the one's who did not hold up their end of the bargin or 'social contract' if you will and that is upholding the Constitution.

Can they be that deft?

No, they are not.

They knew full well what they were doing. Poll after poll showing a majority of Americans against this unAmerican travesty, incidentally those numbers of Americans against it growing by each and everyday as it dragged out thru last year and into 2010.



Did those bent on shredding the Constitution heed the message? NO.

Each special election in 2009, aside from one that was rigged (NY-23), also showed the people were against this at the ballot box especially in liberal Massachusetts with the election of Scott Brown.



 Did those bent on shredding the Constitution heed the message? NO.

Tea Party gatherings across the country for more than a year culminating in the 912 March in D.C. with thousands upon thousands of Americans from all religions, political ideologies, cultures and every State in the Union. Most of whom had never thought of doing so before spoke with one loud and unified voice at the Capitol steps, NO!



Did those bent on shredding the Constitution heed the message? NO.

Very vocal and not to be misunderstood Americans at Townhall forums getting up close and personal to those whom they understood to represent them, looking those 'representatives' face to face telling them NO!





                                                         
Did those bent on shredding the Constitution heed the message? NO.

We, the unwashed masses were told we are stupid. We were told we were Nazis. We were told we were racists and terrorists. We also witnessed corruption in our government on a scale unseen before. I say unseen as I am sure it happens all the time, but if there was anything 'transparent' about this 'process' it was in fact the bribes.


Those bent on shredding the Constitution are acting like a Juanta in a banana republic disregarding entirely the people and the afore mentioned Constitution which up until now was the LAW OF THE LAND.

I do not condone cowardly acts of violence or vandalism no matter who does it, and there are plenty of examples from those on the left. But again, can they be so deft as not to antisipate this concidering their actions? American history is replete with such actions (i.e. violence) from its very inseption when freedom itself is threatened.

As they say, be careful what you wish for as you may just get it.

There is another phrase that applies in this situation;  You've made your bed now lie in it.

Honestly, What Did They Expect?






Wednesday, March 24, 2010

South East Michigan, Mark Your Calenders; Rick Synder Townhalls

Good afternoon,

Continuing on our mission to make sure I have an opportunity to present my Reinvent Michigan plan to all Michiganders, I would like to invite you to attend additional events of the Reinvent Michigan Tour. We are adding new events in Washtenaw and Macomb Counties. At these town halls, I will share my 10-point plan to Reinvent Michigan and take questions about my vision for Michigan directly from the audience. These forums are open to the public and media, and anyone interested is encouraged to attend. The town halls are free to attend, but participants are asked to RSVP online at www.rickformichigan.com.

Economic Town Hall Schedule of Events

Thursday, March 25

Washtenaw Town Hall Forum with Rick Snyder
Cobblestone Farms
2781 Packard Road
Ann Arbor, MI, 48108
Time: 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tuesday, March 31

Macomb Town Hall Forum with Rick Snyder
Best Western Sterling Inn
34911 Van Dyke Avenue at 15 Mile Road
Sterling Heights, MI 48312
Time: 6:30 pm – 8:00 pm


Our "Reinvent Michigan" tour has been making a big impression all over Michigan. Click here to read about what others have been saying about the events. We will continue to add additional events in the future, and hope to come to your neighborhood soon.

I also wanted to pass along a brief overview of recent polling from my campaign strategists, John Yob and John Weaver:

Last week, another poll came out that showed that Rick has moved into a three-way tie for first place. The analysis provided by Bill Ballenger in Inside Michigan Politics on the IMP/MRG poll showed that we actually lead the competition by at least 3 points amongst “all possible voters.” That’s a strong indicator in a year that we can expect high turnout. Amongst “likely voters”, we earn 19% vote and 1% lean, while two of our competitors earn 16% vote and 5% lean. Our support is growing at an incredible pace and while we still have a long ways to go, we’re thrilled that we’ve gone from the margin of error to where we are in just 6 weeks.

For more information about our campaign, or to find out how you can do your part to Reinvent Michigan, please visit http://www.rickformichigan.com/.

Regards, Rick Synder

Ann Coulter on Michael Coren Show - Canadian Television









UPDATE

Right-wing U.S. firebrand Ann Coulter will file grievance with rights panel
By Kenyon Wallace, National Post
As U.S. pundit Ann Coulter prepares to visit Canada this week, a senior University of Ottawa administrator has warned her to use "restraint, respect and consideration" when speaking at the school. 
Inflammatory right-wing pundit Ann Coulter took aim at a University of Ottawa administrator Monday night, saying an e-mail from the school warning her to use “restraint, respect and consideration” when addressing Ontario students during a speaking tour this week made her a victim of a “hate crime.”
Speaking to students and academics at the University of Western Ontario Monday, Coulter said the e-mail sent to her Friday by Francois Houle, vice-president academic and provost of the University of Ottawa, targeted her as a member of an identifiable group and as such, she will be filing a complaint with the Human Rights Commission alleging hate speech.

“I’m sure the Human Rights Commission will get to the bottom of it,” Coulter said to loud cheers from the 800-strong audience. “I think I’m the victim of a hate crime here. Either what (Mr. Houle) did was a hate crime, or the whole commission is BS.”

In Houle’s e-mail, a copy of which was obtained by the National Post, the administrator urges Coulter to weigh her words with “respect and civility in mind” when she speaks at the University of Ottawa campus Tuesday.

“Our domestic laws, both provincial and federal, delineate freedom of expression (or ‘free speech’) in a manner that is somewhat different than the approach taken in the United States. I therefore encourage you to educate yourself, if need be, as to what is acceptable in Canada and to do so before your planned visit here.”

Houle goes on: “Promoting hatred against any identifiable group would not only be considered inappropriate, but could in fact lead to criminal charges.”

Ezra Levant, lawyer and former publisher of the Western Standard magazine, spoke before Coulter on Monday and called Houle’s letter a “veiled threat.” Seamus Wolfe, the president of the University of Ottawa’s student federation, has already said that Coulter is not welcome on campus and that he is trying to work with the administration to find a venue for her speech elsewhere.

The administration, however, has said it does not object to the fiery pundit’s appearance on campus.

Coulter’s targeting of the University of Ottawa administration and Canada’s Human Rights Commissions came at the end of a half-hour speech that attacked political correctness in the United States and the mainstream media, which she said was uncritical of the Obama administration and unfairly biased against conservatives.

“It’s almost like there is one standard for Conservatives and one completely different one for Liberals,” Coulter told the crowd, which alternated from cheering to booing depending on the topic of discussion, which ranged from gay marriage, illegal immigration to Barack Obama’s new health-care bill.

“A word is either offensive or it’s not. In a world of political correctness, all words are banned unless they’re used against conservatives.”

At one point she criticized gays for comparing their plight in the U.S. with the hardships experienced by blacks during the civil rights movement. She also called Mr. Obama the “first 100 per cent politically correct president.”

Coulter began her speech to a standing ovation from about three-quarters of the crowd and said she harboured no hard feelings about the U.S. hockey team’s loss to Canada at the Winter Olympics.

Apart from her anger toward the University of Ottawa and the human rights commissions, Coulter was uncritical of Canada, unlike past comments she has made about this country.

Even though Coulter is not a Canadian citizen, Levant, who has been involved in human rights law cases, said it would not be “outlandish” for Coulter to file a complaint against the University of Ottawa, especially in light of the 1985 Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration case.

The decision in that case, considered a leading constitutional decision by the Supreme Court of Canada, said that foreign nationals are protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.







Tuesday, March 23, 2010

A.C.O.R.N. Is Still Around and Not Going Anywhere, Just Changing the Name



Everyone is all a buzz about A.C.O.R.N. going bankrupt and "disbanding". First, this is only at the National level. Second, it is only a name change, they are not going away. These same criminals will be at your doors this summer as census workers.

Both business and criminals usually change their identities so as to shed bad publicity or evade the law after certain revelations, this is no different and do not kid yourself otherwise.

Some of the new names are already popping up, remember there are 50 states (yes, 50 states not 57) so there may be as many new names. In CA - ACORN is now Alliance of Californians for Community Empowerment, in NY - ACORN has become New York Communities for Change.

Along with those is the group ACORN Housing, one of the best-funded of the groups now calling itself the Affordable Housing Centers of America.

They just got back federal funding for petes sake, did you really believe they would walk away from that?

This Guy Makes Sense,,,



I have no clue how I stumbled across this, but this guy sure sums up my thoughts and mood for that matter,,,

Monday, March 22, 2010

Liberty Lost

They say a picture is worth a thousand words,,,,,,,


Socialism at Work


Venezuela punishes 80 firms for power use
By Andrew Cawthorne

CARACAS, March 21 (Reuters) - Venezuela announced on Sunday 24-hour power cutoffs for dozens of companies that have failed to reduce usage in the first punitive measures of a nationwide drive to save energy amid an electricity crisis.


Restaurants, liquor stores, hotels, gyms, car dealerships and a yacht club were on the list of 80 firms in the capital Caracas due to have their power cut on Monday for failing to bring consumption down 20 percent, the state utility said.


The local unit of Japanese firm Sony Corp (6758.T) will also be among those sanctioned.


President Hugo Chavez's government has introduced rationing, and demanded power cuts across the South American OPEC member, to cope with an electricity shortage that is jeopardizing Venezuela's ability to pull out of a recession.



Read more; http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN2150251320100321?type=marketsNews

REPEAL IT, LETS GET TO WORK

OBAMA CARE PASSES - SIEG HEIL, WE ARE SOCIALIST NOW





MAY GOD SAVE US FROM OURSELVES I PRAY.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

Exectutive Orders?????????????



Executive order(s) 



Leland-Boker Authorized Edition of the Emancipation Proclamation, printed in June 1864 with a presidential signature. An executive order in the United States is an order issued by the President, the head of the executive branch of the federal government. In other countries, similar edicts may be known as decrees, or orders-in-council. Executive orders may also be issued at the state level by a state's Governor or at the local level by the city's Mayor. U.S. Presidents have issued Executive Orders since 1789, usually to help officers and agencies of the Executive branch manage the operations within the Federal Government itself. Executive orders do have the full force of law since issuances are typically made in pursuance of certain Acts of Congress, some of which specifically delegate to the President some degree of discretionary power (delegated legislation), or are believed to have their authority for issuances based in a power inherently granted to the Executive by the Constitution. It is these cited or perceived justifications made by a President when authoring Executive Orders that have come under criticism for exceeding Executive authority and have been subject to legal proceedings even at various times throughout U.S. history concerning the legal validity or justification behind an order's issuanc


 Legal conflicts

To date, U.S. courts have overturned only two executive orders: the aforementioned Truman order, and a 1996 order issued by President Clinton that attempted to prevent the U.S. government from contracting with organizations that had strike-breakers on the payroll.[9] Congress may overturn an executive order by passing legislation in conflict with it or by refusing to approve funding to enforce it. In the former, the president retains the power to veto such a decision; however, the Congress may override a veto with a two-thirds majority to end an executive order. It has been argued that a Congressional override of an executive order is a nearly impossible event due to the supermajority vote required and the fact that such a vote leaves individual lawmakers very vulnerable to political criticism.

This practice also holds the reality that any president including the one who makes it can in fact retract it. One just has to look at the "Mexico City Policy" which has flp-flopped between presidents ever since Reagan.

By the way, that policy does in fact make the Nation acting illegally under the Hyde Ammendment by unsing Federal (taxpayer) money for abortions yet overseas.

Failed Model - Unintended Consequences



Saturday, March 20, 2010

An Open Question To the U.S. Military - All Branches

It seems that our shared Nation is at a cross-roads.

Our current president acts without regard to our shared Constitution. Our current socialist-leaning controlled congress does much to enable the former by disregarding standing law and prodocol as to its proceedings and limits enumerated within said Constitution. If that is not all, our third branch of government, the judiciary seems to act out of political fiat and winds as opposed to the same Constitution that the other two branches willfully ignore.

Not withstanding your sacrifice to and for our shared Nation I must inquire as to your oath pertaining to the keywords;

"I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same"

At this moment you are probably saying "what about obeying the commander in chief"? Well I remind you this is a government by the people, of the people and for the people (which includes you) and if the current commander in chief (elected by the former) is AGAINST THE PEOPLE , or in other words NOT FOLLOWING THE CONSTITUTION, then I dare say you have quite a question before you.

I do not whatsoever ask or question as to your patriotism or loalty to our Nation, but rather seek your view as to what you are now risking your lives for, the Constitution of these United States of America and the defense thereof OR the opposite of that which many of you are fighting AGAINST and dieing for right now, being that of oppression.

Please re-read the first paragraph.

 I am the son of a MSG (3 up-3 down).,1st Div., U.S. Army Veteran (R.I.P.) and know exactly where he would stand on such a question if not kick my arse for asking it. But then again he is not around now (except in my heart, mind and soul), if he were I am damned sure he to would be asking the same while openly and very forcefully asking aloud : "What the hell happened to our Constitution"!?!?!



CP Note: All Military are more than welcome to comment no matter the branch, rank, current or veteran. Your thoughts are always welcome at Conservative Perspective.

And this,,just because,,,,,



Thursday, March 18, 2010

Open Thread: What Did YOU Think About The FoxNews Interview?

This is TOTALLY OPEN. I have my own thoughts (obviously) but really want yours as well.


When I say OPEN I mean OPEN, tis' rare for me but if foul language is required to convey your point then do so. I only ask that you do not attack other commentors.






Tuesday, March 16, 2010

(2) UPDATES : Video - Rep. Michelle Bachman on un-Constitutional Process,,Rep. Mike Pence on the House Floor Today, Try Pelosi For TREASON

Spread this video around



h/t Left Coast Rebel



March 16, 2010 — Congressman Mike Pence gave the following speech from the floor of the U.S. House, urging his colleagues to not abuse the Constitutional process in trying to ram through a government takeover of health care.




Washington D.C. March 16, 2010

Unions Robbing Aid Recipients, This Will Anger You

Mom: Union Dues Taken Out Of Aid Check
Woman Says She Doesn't Belong To Any Unions


MACOMB TOWNSHIP, Mich. -- A Macomb Township mom who stays at home to take care of her disabled son said she's lost hundreds of dollars in union dues that were automatically deducted when she doesn't even belong to one.




Geri Millirons said her 32-year-old son is a microsephalic spastic quadriplegic, who doesn't speak and needs constant care.

Millirons said she receives $700 a month from the state to help with the costs of home care, and noticed a deduction of $20 a month for union dues about four years ago.











Millirons said she is not an employee of any state department or office, and has not been getting any union benefits like health care or retirement.

"They don't represent me. I am a mother, I take care of my son. I still work 24 hours a day, weekends and holidays," she said.

After questioning and demanding that the state stop the deductions, Millirons said they did -- but have not issued her a reimbursement for the roughly $700 that were taken out.

She said she wants to warn others about the automatic deductions.

"I know there are hundreds of women out here in the country just like me," she said.

Rep. Kim Meltzer has been working to introduce a bill that would end the automatic deductions.


Rep. Kim Meltzer (R-MI House District 33)

"It was an inter-local agreement between the governor and the union officials. But why was this put in place? And why are family members who are taking care of their own children being required to be in a union?" Meltzer said.

The House bill is No. 6844.






Monday, March 15, 2010

Hope? Change? CORRECTED-Israeli envoy sees "historic crisis" with U.S.-report


CORRECTED-Israeli envoy sees "historic crisis" with U.S.-report
Reuters - Tuesday, March 16

.JERUSALEM - Israeli-U.S. relations have hit a 35-year low over a West Bank settlement plan that threatens to derail peacemaking efforts with the Palestinians, Israel's envoy to Washington was quoted as saying on Monday.


The comments attributed to Ambassador Michael Oren, a noted Middle East historian, clashed with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's assurances that the row resulting from a settlement announcement deemed "insulting" by the Obama administration was under control.

"Israel's ties with the United States are in their worst crisis since 1975 ... a crisis of historic proportions," the Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper quoted Oren as telling other Israeli diplomats in a telephone briefing over the weekend.

The remarks, also carried by other Israeli media, appeared to refer to U.S. pressure in 1975 for an Israeli redeployment in the Egyptian Sinai, occupied by Israel since the 1967 war and the site of renewed fighting in 1973.

Israel's Foreign Ministry had no immediate comment.

An Israeli plan to build 1,600 more homes for Jews in West Bank land annexed to Jerusalem was announced during a visit by U.S. Vice President Joe Biden aimed at ushering in indirect peace negotiations with the Palestinians.

In unusually blunt language, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Israel's behaviour "insulting." In a CNN interview on Friday, she said bilateral ties were "not at risk. I mean, our relationship is durable and strong."

Netanyahu, who has vowed to continue building in and around Jerusalem while reining in construction of Jewish settlements on other occupied land where Palestinians seek a state, voiced regret for what he described as bureaucratic happenstance.

"We know how to deal with these situations -- with equanimity, responsibly and seriously," he said on Sunday.

A U.S. envoy is due back in the region later in the week to try to get peace talks, suspended since December 2008, under way. Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas had resisted restarting negotiations without a total Israeli settlement freeze.


In other headlines;

Is China's Politburo spoiling for a showdown with America?


The long-simmering clash between the world's two great powers is coming to a head, with dangerous implications for the international system.

Full article here:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/ambroseevans_pritchard/7442926/Is-Chinas-Politburo-spoiling-for-a-showdown-with-America.html