Now what this woman is suggesting is that the word illegal is in of itself racist which is on its face absurd of course. She uses it in the context of immigration but if one were to look deeper into just that one word and her idea it fits the narrative of this current administration.
Take this idea of losing the term of "illegal" to its nth degree, meaning there is no such thing as anything illegal and guess what, there is no Constitution. This is the goal they seek.
Do not deceive yourself, this is a battle for the very survival of a Nation in which we live. We are either a Nation of laws or not. If those who challenge the very word "illegal" in any context and win the day then our Nation ceases to exist as founded and there are only two ways which things may go at that point; Anarchy or absolute tyranny.
So what do you choose in 2012:
(1) A Republic as founded, governed by her people by laws agreed upon and amended to as time and the wisdom of said people so desired and voted upon.
(2) A piece of huge real estate between Mexico and Canada of marauding tribes preying on those who did not prepare being slaughtered.
(3) (Not much difference from #2); A complete dictatorial tyrant controlling everything from the time you wake to the time you are ordered to try to sleep.
The choices above are not limited to any ideological thought be they Liberal/Conservative, Republican/Democrat, Independent/Moderate nor are they limited to any race, religion or gender. No, this is an open question to all those who cherish freedom based upon law that includes a terminology known as illegal for without it anything goes.